STARKVILLE — After many months of speeches, political ads, TV & radio commercials and social media propaganda, trying to have a serious discussion of education funding in Mississippi is in great measure a fool’s errand and an errand that is dependent on one’s world view.

With all that posturing and number-tossing, did we really learn anything useful or new? The takeaway seems that there is a substantial appetite for higher education funding, but not for the new taxes or the spending cuts in other vital government services necessary to provide that funding.

For the record, in the fiscal year 2019 budget, Mississippi spent $2.937 billion on education, or 53% of the state’s $5.548 billion in regular general fund appropriations. That’s $2.234 billion, or 40%, on K-12 public education and $716.1 million, or 13%, on the state’s eight public universities and 15 public community colleges.

And by anyone’s measure, Democrat or Republican, liberal or conservative rich or poor, $2.937 billion is a lot of money. But the question of the worth of that investment, now that’s a question heavily dependent on one’s world view and partisan and philosophical affiliations.

The contenders in Mississippi’s 2019 elections battled incessantly over education spending, teacher pay, public versus private education, education funding formulas and other policy questions. The governor’s and lieutenant governor’s races were thick with education charges and countercharges.

In June of this year, the U.S. Census Bureau Annual Survey of School System Finances took a broader, less-politicized look at education spending at the K-12 level based on national 2017 numbers by state. Despite Mississippi taxpayers spending $2.234 billion on K-12 education in 2019, the state in 2017 ranked 47th in per pupil spending at $8,771.

What is the source of K-12 education spending in Mississippi? The Census Bureau reported in the same study of 2017 budgets that 51% came from state taxes while 35% came from local taxes and 14% came from federal taxes (a higher percentage of federal sourced funds than any state except New Mexico).

Here’s how Mississippi’s $8,771 per-pupil expenditure was spent in 2017: $4,971 on instruction, $462 on pupil support, $407 on instruction support, $289 on general administration, $531 on school administration and $2,110 on other expenses, including capital outlays and intergovernmental transfers.

The news on higher education funding in Mississippi isn’t much better. In fact, the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities claims that adjusted for inflation, per-student funding for Mississippi public colleges and universities is 34% below 2008 levels.

Simultaneously, CBPP claims that between 2008 and 2018, tuition costs at Mississippi’s four-year public universities increased on average by $2,361. The group concluded that the combination of a declining percentage of state support for higher education and an increasing percentage of tuition has made higher education less affordable and an endangered quality at the state’s public universities.

As for the state’s community colleges, perhaps no facet of Mississippi education had more promises made to it during Mississippi’s 2019 campaign season. Politicians talked often about workforce training and the role of community colleges in that process.

But nationally, federal spending on financial aid tripled from $50 billion in 1995 to more than $150 billion in 2015, but state spending on higher education per full-time student decreased by 28% over the same period.

Particularly thorny is the issue of Pell Grants, the federal educational grants of up to $5,775 that go to families making less than $50,000 a year. Most recipient families make closer to $20,000 annually, according to Forbes Magazine. All of Mississippi’s higher education institutions benefit from the Pell Grant program — as do lower-income working families across the state.

Twice during his term in office, President Donald Trump has discussed a diversion of up to $2 billion in Pell Grant funds or an outright funding cut of the program, once as a means of financing his plans to beef up NASA for a moon shot or another U.S. return to space travel.

Sid Salter is director of the Office of University Relations at Mississippi State University. Contact him at

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.