Michael Watson

Secretary of State Michael Watson has been hosting a series of public hearings about ballot initiatives on medical marijuana, including one this past week in Leflore  County.

Supporters and opponents of the legalization of medical marijuana voiced their concerns during a public hearing in Greenwood this week.

Secretary of State Michael Watson and his office hosted the hearing Thursday night at the Leflore County Civic Center regarding two items on the Nov. 3 ballot: Initiative Measure No. 65 and Alternative Measure No. 65A.

A panel of four speakers provided analyses of the measures, and members of the public also spoke.

“This is an initiative that’s important to our future. If you are for or against it, it’s good to have people who care enough to come out and educate all Mississippians,” Watson said.

The first part of the conversation concerned Measure  65. If passed, the measure would amend the state’s constitution to make medical marijuana available to Mississippians with debilitating medical conditions such as cancer, epilepsy and several other ailments.

The item was placed on the ballot following a petition drive that drew the required number of signatures.

Cody Weaver


Cody Weaver, a U.S. Navy veteran, spoke in its favor. He focused on the positive affects marijuana use has on veterans who are suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and other illnesses.

Edward “Ed” Langton, a Hattiesburg banker and member of the Mississippi State Board of Health, spoke against Measure No. 65, saying he believes medical marijuana would not be administered in an ethical business fashion and would also be a step toward allowing recreational use of the drug.

Then, the conversation turned to the alternative measure, 65A.  The Legislature added the alternative in March because of disagreements with the content of the first initiative.

Under Measure 65, medical marijuana could be recommended for patients with at least one debilitating condition. It also lists specific prices and taxes needed for the program.

Alternative 65A does not specify qualifying conditions or a tax rate, leaving those issues to be resolved by legislators.

Voters will be asked whether they favor either of these or oppose both. Then they may select one or the other. If a majority of voters don’t support at least one of the two, both options are dead. If a majority of them do support at least one, the proposal that receives the most votes on the latter question passes.

Katherine Pannel


Jamie Grantham


Dr. Katherine Pannel, a psychiatrist who practices throughout North Mississippi, spoke in favor of  the alternative. This, she said, would give lawmakers more time to further study the use of medical marijuana.

Jamie Grantham, a spokeswoman for Medical Marijuana 2020, spoke against Alternative Measure No. 65A. Her organization spearheaded the petition drive that put  the initial legalization proposal on the ballot.

Grantham said the alternative acts as a “Trojan horse,” making voters think they are passing a more refined medical marijuana amendment when they are instead allowing politicians to have no guarantees or accountability on the matter.

In addition, Measure 65 does not require any increased tax dollar spending from the state, but this is not guaranteed in the alternative, Grantham said.

Following the panel presentation, six citizens from throughout the state shared views. All spoke in favor of Measure 65 and against Alternative Measure 65A.

Jaleesa Willis

Jaleesa Willis, who is in a wheelchair due to her paralysis, says she would vote for Initiative 65 because it would give her more options for managing her disability.

Brad Corban


One speaker, Jaleesa Willis — who is in a wheelchair due to paralysis — traveled from Cleveland to say that she would be voting for Measure 65 because it would give her more options to handle her disability.

“When you are paralyzed, with the nerves you can’t control in your body, THC does help that,” she said referring to the active ingredient in marijuana.  “It would help me, and people like me, with their daily struggles.”

Brad Corban, a pastor from Cleveland, said that as a public religious figure, he has counseled many people with addictions, including addictions to prescription opioids, but he has never seen a community member suffer from an addiction to marijuana.

He said he believes the use of marijuana as a medicinal supplement could help heal those more effectively than the current use of prescribed drugs.

Watson told the group he always enjoys seeing citizens concerned about the matters on which they will vote. He encourages all citizens to do their own detailed research on the ballot items.

This was the second stop Watson has made on this public hearing tour. The first was in Oxford, and the next stops include Hattiesburg, Meridian and Jackson.

Contact Adam Bakst at 581-7233 or abakst@gwcommonwealth.com. Twitter: @AdamBakst_GWCW

(4) comments


I am just hearing about this meeting. Where is it that the people of Leflore Co. can find out about these public interest events. I would have attended this if I would have been aware of it.


they would prefer the public be unaware so our voices can't be heard. just like how they're creating confusion on the ballot with the 65A option... which is nothing more than a tactic used to kill the use of medical marijuana in the event the people do vote for it, but are tricked into voting for the wrong amendment. why people in this state want others to suffer is beyond me. I guess they're too afraid of an imaginary boogey man to have any common sense.


there are a variety of opioids that are legally allowed to kill Mississippians every single day. medical marijuana is an alternative that will not only help those that are suffering, but it will save lives in the process because it is not a lethal substance. on this issue and like many others, Mississippi will continue to fail due to the ignorance and fear-mongering from the far-right and our "leaders" being bought and paid for by big-pharma.


Hi! I spoke at this hearing as well and do not see myself in this article. Not to mention, a local business owner that is pro-65 and a Doctor that is pro-65 were not mentioned as well. Why is this?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.